(Sawchik) Beaucoup d’échanges. Aucun prospect du top 100 de @BaseballAmerica n’a été échangé.
—
Par NevermoreSEA
Related Posts
Baseball
(Sawchik) Beaucoup d’échanges. Aucun prospect du top 100 de @BaseballAmerica n’a été échangé.
(Sawchik) Beaucoup d’échanges. Aucun prospect du top 100 de @BaseballAmerica n’a été échangé.
—
Par NevermoreSEA
26 Comments
Bro clearly forgetting Jackson Holliday to the White Sox
Chat is this an L trade deadline??
Yeah well there’s no Scherzer or Verlander traded 😉
Possibly why the Angels were so quiet
[deleted]
Who needs prospects when the the white sox and Florida doing all the trading of mlb ready players?
That’s because the Jackson Holliday for Bobby Dalbec trade hasn’t been announced yet
Snelling?
The players available during this deadline were underwhelming af.
Well yeah, that’s for the off-season
After becoming a George Klassen expert a few days ago I’m pretty sure that Baseball America are just haters
This year has a good case for being the most boring trade deadline of all-time.
Isn’t McAdoo ranked at #10?
Sellers market my ass lmao
Gleyber Torres was a top 5 prospect at one point and he got traded for a fucking reliever years ago.
Prospect hugging/trade valuations have never been weaker. This really was the time to go all in if you were a contender.
Looks like the Mets model of paying for prospects isn’t translating.
Jake Bloss is ranked in the 90’s by Fangraphs
I believe Robby Snelling ranked in the Top 100 by BA heading into the season, but sounds like he might be removed now?
I thought Bloss and Lirizano were on it? Maybe just missed?
Does Sawchik work for BA now or something? Guys in every other meaningful top 100 have been included in trades this deadline.
Norby or Stowers?
What about the Jack Flaherty trade and the LAD prospects?
The pendulum may have swung too far in this direction, in the 90s/early 00s people would be totally cool with trading half their Top 10 prospects if it meant a big name in return, now even if you get an All-Star people are like « noooooo not Glurp Shitto bro he was our #47 prospect!! »
This is why context matters when it comes to the Padres trading away « top prospects ».
This is wrong, liranzo is 88.
Edit: was 88 I guess? A couple weeks ago
Damn, Liranzo wasn’t top 100?
Dodgers number 3 isn’t a top 100 prospect? I’m kinda surprised.
The lists change like my child diaper. We’ll see next year.